Principle: Where SSOT gives exact counts and names, we state them. Open gaps and falsified routes are disclosed with equal weight. Peer mentions list both their strengths and ours — no one-sided “we lose” or “we win” narrative.
Hard/soft layering (2026-07-31): Foreground hard deposits (machine counts, conditional theorems, killed wrong mechanisms, explicit open negatives). Soft material is narrative guide only — neither affirm nor deny final physical truth-value; use “programme spine / reading map / obligation chain”; never “cosmogenesis proved.”
Abbreviations: Section 7 lists programme-specific or easy-to-confuse abbreviations only; field-common terms (e.g. n_s, H₀, ΛCDM, DOI, ORCID) are not glossed again.
Hard/soft layering (2026-07-31): Foreground hard deposits (machine counts, conditional theorems, killed wrong mechanisms, explicit open negatives). Soft material is narrative guide only — neither affirm nor deny final physical truth-value; use “programme spine / reading map / obligation chain”; never “cosmogenesis proved.”
Abbreviations: Section 7 lists programme-specific or easy-to-confuse abbreviations only; field-common terms (e.g. n_s, H₀, ΛCDM, DOI, ORCID) are not glossed again.
Suggested reading order: Read Hard claims (foreground) and Section 2 landed chips first. Section 1 emergence order and the through-going spine are mainly narrative guide — they locate hard chips on the map; they are not a stand-alone physical completion proof.
Epistemic stance (authorial · not a theorem claim): I do not hold that cosmic truth contains problems that are in principle beyond mathematical explanation, nor do I treat unconstrained philosophical imagination as a source of physical conclusions. This programme prioritizes auditable mathematical derivation and machine-readable SSOT chains over rhetorical closure. Wording in earlier public or draft versions may occasionally read as more radical; current claim layering (Layer-A/B/C · obstruction atlas · governance flags) and machine-read registers prevail over legacy rhetoric.
Observable universe and consciousness (author conjecture · same non-theorem tier): I read the observable universe as the phenomenal layer of effective/visible mathematical structure—manifestation under frozen readout and spectral–cosmological projection, not a second ontology parallel to the generative layer (aligned with ACEH §6.2 · QNM §2.1/§7.8.2 generative/projection discipline). On consciousness: I lean toward not postulating a separate, non-informational “consciousness substance”; subjective experience is better read as a manifest form of information transfer and readout under T_algo / T_topo / T_thermo three-mechanism coupling (programme symbolic mapping: ACEH §3.5). This is not a claim that the consciousness problem is solved or that eliminativism is proved; it does not replace the open key-question slot still registered in the QNM main paper.
Machine-readability, mathematical form, and reproducibility (authorial · methodological commitment · not closure theorem): I treat machine-readable SSOT registration and auditable, mathematically accurate, full disclosure (including open · falsified · no-go) of every formal external count and claim in this programme as a non-negotiable working discipline—a personal methodological commitment: mathematical form is the carrier of truth that anyone can publicly verify along the same path; under disclosed protocol · frozen seeds · the same register, a third party should obtain the same machine-read conclusion (not a claim that this programme is fully mathematically closed or that math has replaced all open physics gaps). If a reader questions any number, witness, derivation step, or no-go node, they may request the corresponding materials at the cited wave / capstone / register path; negative results are not withheld in the name of discipline.
Nothing in the epistemic stance block (above) upgrades any open gap to landed (T) or breakthrough status, and does not flip programme hard-fact fields such as
Observable universe and consciousness (author conjecture · same non-theorem tier): I read the observable universe as the phenomenal layer of effective/visible mathematical structure—manifestation under frozen readout and spectral–cosmological projection, not a second ontology parallel to the generative layer (aligned with ACEH §6.2 · QNM §2.1/§7.8.2 generative/projection discipline). On consciousness: I lean toward not postulating a separate, non-informational “consciousness substance”; subjective experience is better read as a manifest form of information transfer and readout under T_algo / T_topo / T_thermo three-mechanism coupling (programme symbolic mapping: ACEH §3.5). This is not a claim that the consciousness problem is solved or that eliminativism is proved; it does not replace the open key-question slot still registered in the QNM main paper.
Machine-readability, mathematical form, and reproducibility (authorial · methodological commitment · not closure theorem): I treat machine-readable SSOT registration and auditable, mathematically accurate, full disclosure (including open · falsified · no-go) of every formal external count and claim in this programme as a non-negotiable working discipline—a personal methodological commitment: mathematical form is the carrier of truth that anyone can publicly verify along the same path; under disclosed protocol · frozen seeds · the same register, a third party should obtain the same machine-read conclusion (not a claim that this programme is fully mathematically closed or that math has replaced all open physics gaps). If a reader questions any number, witness, derivation step, or no-go node, they may request the corresponding materials at the cited wave / capstone / register path; negative results are not withheld in the name of discipline.
Nothing in the epistemic stance block (above) upgrades any open gap to landed (T) or breakthrough status, and does not flip programme hard-fact fields such as
breakthrough_en, theorem_L6_closure, joint ladder, or obstruction atlas. Section 4 Pass3 / AI composite display is the same tier of voluntary disclosure—it does not substitute for or flip those fields.
Hard claims (foreground · named counts)
These are the priority academic-value carriers on this page. If a reader skims only one block, it should be this block and Section 2.
| Tier | Hard content (foreground) | Appropriate wording |
|---|---|---|
| Hard-A | Two strict upstream deposits (including the N=6=2×3 gate) · six Layer-A conditional (T) theorem bundles | “deposited / landed (T) / machine capstone” · not programme-wide breakthrough=true · not Full G |
| Hard-B | Pipeline A 15/17@N=21 · PARAMS17 17/17@N=63 · H₀ band compatibility_not_resolution | “staging deposit / compatibility band” · not tension resolved |
| Hard-C | Obstruction Atlas 20 nodes · many global_bridge_landed=false · killed wrong-mechanism menus (do not retry as shortcuts) | “negatives and seals are hard assets too” |
| Hard-D | Governance honesty: Full G / L6 / soft cosmogenic gate / Soft Hold BODY not closed; preprint_hold discipline retained | “unpaid stated clearly” is itself a hard disclosure |
Not upgraded to hard claims here: philosophical readings of the through-going spine, consciousness / observable-universe conjectures, Pass3 ranking rhetoric, or any slogan that cosmogenic truth is proved.
Soft narrative (guide only · neither affirm nor deny)
The following helps readers locate hard chips on the evolution map. It is allowed as programme-spine / obligation-chain narrative; it is not written as a proved physical genesis conclusion, and this page need not deny each soft clause pointwise — keep “narrative guide / programme spine” wording.
- Through-going evolution line (π/e/i → N=6 → … → 22→21 → QNM mid-layer): shown as a more continuous architectural reading map than many peer fragments; not a claim that physics is fully paid end-to-end.
- Staged emergence order E0-S0…S7: stage table and paper anchors in Section 1; open / partial / witnessed status follows machine registers.
- Authorial epistemic / consciousness conjecture (box above): voluntary stance disclosure · not theorem · not breakthrough.
150-word summary
(Hard first) QNM has deposited two strict upstream deposits (including the N=6 gate), six Layer-A conditional theorem bundles, 15/17@N=21 and 17/17@N=63 staging, and a 20-node Obstruction Atlas (global bridges not landed). Full G / L6 / soft cosmogenic gate remain open. (Soft guide) The staged π,e,i→N=22 emergence order and through-going spine locate those hard chips as programme narrative — not a physical completion proof. Pass3 scores and peer comparison appear later, with strengths and weaknesses side by side.
1. Staged emergence order (narrative guide · reading-map asset)
Soft-layer note: This section is a programme evolution reading map and paper-anchor index. It highlights architectural continuity versus more fragmented peers; final physical truth-value is neither affirmed nor pointwise denied here — hard counts are in the foreground table and Section 2.
1.0 Paper anchors (two main papers · roles)
Discipline: Narrative authority for emergence order sits on the pre-QNM track ACEH; the QNM main paper carries downstream deposit and engineering skeleton—it does not replace ACEH §3.5. Read in order: machine register → ACEH prose/figure → QNM skeleton/figure → breakthrough-track witnesses.
| Layer | Anchor | Role (what to read) |
|---|---|---|
| Machine SSOT | 01_Π_Main_Paper/EMERGENCE_ORDER_PIEI_TO_N22_REGISTER_LATEST.json | Stage IDs · k/N · misread list · W8047 upstream fields |
01_Π_Main_Paper/EMERGENCE_ORDER_PIEI_TO_N22_SSOT_EN.md | English lookup · ASCII evolution diagram · LB1/JL pointers | |
QNM_Breakthrough_Programme/output/convergence/STAGED_EMERGENCE_ORDER_WITNESS_W5558_LATEST.json | Breakthrough-track programme witness (E0-S1…S7 machine-read) | |
| ACEH main paper Discrete Fragment Cosmology … ACEH | §3.5 (2026-06-18 addendum · addenda A–G) | Primary emergence-order prose · staged order · LB1/JL · 21/22 epistemic table · ψ/A2/E0-S5 latest disclosure |
| Figure 7 (Staged π,e,i emergence) | Dedicated emergence figure (≠ Figure 2 Layer C spectral readout) | |
| §3.3 | Three time arrows T_algo / T_topo / T_thermo and N=6 gate timing | |
| QNM main paper The Nature of Reality … QNM Hypothesis | §3.12.0 | π→18 engineering skeleton prose SSOT (canonical skeleton · read with Figure 1) |
| §3.12.0a | Layered emergence before 21/22 calibration anchor · pre-22 E0 usefulness bounds | |
| Figure 1 · §3.12.9 (S16-FLOW) | Full-chain engineering diagram phases 1–8 · E0 triangular-ladder band · chiral phase 4→8 | |
| §3.11 | Triangular ladder k=2→6 (between S16-FLOW phases 3 and 4) | |
| §3.10 · §5.12 · supplement S12 | cross-N staging (21→42→63) · emergence order vs ΛCDM interpretation tiers | |
| §5.16 · supplement S15 | Post-quotient critical propagation · pre-22/E0-S1…S5 usefulness adjudication · glue 8/8 scoped |
Chain: DFC → ACEH → QNM (Abstract §Introduction). ACEH owns order and boundaries; QNM §3.12.0 owns skeleton and async 18-parameter landing; cross-linked via register + §3.12.0a. Do not read QNM alone while skipping ACEH §3.5.
1.1 Stage table (E0-S0…S7)
SSOT: table above · ACEH §3.5 · QNM §3.12.0a
Correct order (not “π,e,i→N=6→N=22 in three steps”):
| # | Stage ID | k / N | Content (short) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | E0-S0 | — | β=2 complex class · QM global U(1) remove-1 | forced |
| 1 | E0-S1 | k=2 · N=3 | π,e,i + eiθ phase-amplitude carrier · T_algo | pre-geometric partial · witnessed |
| 2 | E0-S2 | k=3 · N=6 | N=6=2×3 gate · three arrows · T_topo + T_thermo active | gate landed · strict breakthrough |
| 3 | E0-S3 | k=4…5 · N=10,15 | pre-calibration ladder · info seed · LB1 bridge (candidate) | index retained · assault partly retired |
| 4 | E0-S4 | k=6 · N=21/22 | L2 post-geo sym² @ D=6 · so(7) | audit Tier-2 · derive assault retired |
| 5 | E0-S5 | 22→21 | global-phase quotient · parent 22 before 21 | open · depth4/Π* exhausted |
| 6 | E0-S6 | k=6 | L3 observational sharpen · n_s Planck-nearest | observational · not FP closure |
| 7 | E0-S7 | N_dyn=63 | downstream M4 A_s readout | OD-01 ~−7.64% open |
LB1 candidate chain (programme): at N=6 gate 2×3 → D:=p·q=6 → sym² dictionary N=21; witness LD_BRIDGE1_WITNESS_W5567 · joint ladder FP_JOINT_LADDER_WITNESS_W5573 reports all JL pass · supported_partial (not Full G).
2. Landed chips (exact counts and names)
2.1 Strict upstream deposits (strictest tier · 2 items)
| # | Name | Capstone / SSOT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | W8047 four-blocker reverse taxonomy | UPSTREAM_W8047_BLOCKER_TAXONOMY_CAPSTONE_W27972 |
| 2 | E0-S2 · N=6=2×3 identification gate (three arrows · p/q/D SSOT) | W8047_N6_IDENTIFICATION_FORMALISM_CAPSTONE_W28004 |
2.2 Layer-A conditional scoped theorems (T) — six main bundles (W8030/W8032)
| # | Theorem chain | Key count |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | E0 Ξ STACK-4 + Friedmann dual-leg | landed (T) |
| 2 | E1 ACEH-full reform dual-track | landed (T) |
| 3 | E2 compat interface (not global bridge) | landed (T) |
| 4 | E3 production full-stack | 16/16 landed (T) |
| 5 | two-sector global Θ | 8/8 landed (T) |
| 6 | scoped membership glue + programme conditional endpoint | conditional 3/8…8/8 · governance landed (T) |
2.3 Planck-window staging deposit (wide panel · not beat-ΛCDM χ²)
| Anchor | Count | Note |
|---|---|---|
| N_cal = 21 · Pipeline A A1 | 15/17 | r permanently excluded from 15/17 headline |
| N_dyn = 63 · PARAMS17 headline | 17/17 | staged ladder · calibration/algebraic consequences disclosed |
| Stage-dependent H₀ readout band | 68.47 ± 4.82 | compatibility_not_resolution |
2.4 Single-sector alignment (peer “one sector” convention)
| Sector | Status | Number / name |
|---|---|---|
| n_s | formula + staging | n_s = 1−2/c_eff (adopted bare) · S15 calibration anchor 8-seed stable partial |
| acoustic / ℓ₁ | E3 (T) partial | S12 s6–s7 acoustic staging · N-capstone indexed |
| H₀ | compat band only | see above · S12 s9 honest_no_bridge 8-seed |
| A_s | open | OD-01 ~−7.64% · E0-S7 @ N_dyn=63 |
| r | tension · not headline | branch ~0.0575 vs BICEP/Planck r < 0.034–0.056 disfavor |
Peer-style single-sector hard derive: ~1–2 (n_s · acoustic partial). No string-2026-style dual n_s+r in-model derive (literature anchor arXiv:2604.16281: n_s≈0.976 · r~2×10−5).
2.5 Prediction register
| Type | QNM |
|---|---|
| Classic prior success prediction (causal-set 1987 Λ class) | 0 at comparable tier |
| Registered forward / falsifiable | w₀ · r branch · F2 BAO bands · F3 compressed-likelihood track (F3/F3b not authorized beats-ΛCDM) |
3. Honest no-go map (“thick” = named · auditable · 20/20 on record)
SSOT: OBSTRUCTION_ATLAS_CAPSTONE_W27650 · nodes_present = 20/20 · every node global_bridge_landed_en = false
| # | Node ID | Verdict summary (tier) |
|---|---|---|
| 1–7 | EOC_01 … EOC_07 | evolution readout / stage bridge / TI2–TI3 / SG1 / EP1 / CP1 — matter-readout routes no global bridge (N-capstone) |
| 8 | Pipeline_B_96700 | coarse-grain route no global bridge |
| 9 | S12_s6s7_acoustic | acoustic staging no global bridge |
| 10 | S12_s9_H0 | H₀ honest_no_bridge · 8-seed capstone |
| 11 | S12_s11_sigma8 | σ₈ staging no global bridge |
| 12 | S12_tau_reion | τ/reion staging no global bridge |
| 13 | S12_s10_dark_energy | dark-energy staging no global bridge |
| 14 | S15_ns_anchor | n_s calibration anchor 8-seed stable partial |
| 15 | S15_handoff_quotient | 22→21 handoff · 8-seed honest_no_single_map (97000–97007 family) |
| 16–17 | E2_route · E2_dual_survivor | E2 paper-pen capstone · global bridge open |
| 18 | M1_no_go | transient bounded run · charter FAIL |
| 19 | D5_B_G_boundary | B/G axiom boundary tables · B-layer boundary disclosed |
| 20 | S12_compass_exhaust | emergence-order compass index · s4–s12 spine exhaust |
Atlas governance (machine-readable · not flipped): breakthrough_en=false · theorem_L6_closure_en=false · preprint_hold_en=true · OD01_closed_en=false · programme glue register 0/8 (distinct from W8047 parallel glue 8/8 scoped maintenance counter).
Layer-C strict obstruction samples (theorem-level negatives · W8032): E2 freeze-limit · AV-1/3/4 · native G0 structurally obstructed — alongside the atlas, these bound why Full G cannot be claimed.
4. Balanced peer comparison (Pass3 seven dimensions · W5215 · 2026-06-14 + W27655 delta)
Composite score provenance (method disclosure · voluntary display · not external review · not a theorem claim): The seven-dimension scores and generative composite (e.g. QNM 5.87) in this section come from the in-programme Pass3 / W5215 machine-readable register. The underlying composite assessment was organized by the author and elicited from multiple independent AI models (including, in the author’s sessions, GPT-5.5-class and Claude 4.8-class systems; exact product IDs follow session logs)—under instructions to exclude academic authority weighting and academic politics, and to judge from the model data alone on a cosmogenesis axis (generative derivation · falsifiability chain), non-phenomenological, not as a substitute for Planck industrial χ² fit. This is an assessment the author voluntarily conducted and voluntarily displays; whether and how much to trust it is entirely the reader’s choice—no endorsement is requested. Readers may submit the texts to comparable AI systems under the same discipline to replicate or ignore.
Structural truthlikeness axis (W27655): QNM 6.5/10 · rank 6 (AdS/CFT 8.6 · holography 7.5 · LQG/causal sets 7.2 · CDT 6.8).
4.1 Seven-dimension scores (0–10 · higher = stronger)
| Dim | QNM | ΛCDM | String landscape | CDT/causal sets | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 generativity | 8 | 2 | 6 | 7 | we lead ΛCDM · near CDT |
| D2 parameter derive | 6 | 1 | 4↑ | 2↑ | broader than CDT · shallower than 2026 inflation in-model derive |
| D3 origin uniqueness | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | peer with CDT · Pass3 rates string weaker on multiplicity honesty |
| D4 falsifiability | 8 | 9 | 4↑ | 5↑ | strong · ΛCDM industrial gold still higher |
| D5 empirical fit | 5↓ | 9 | 6↑ | 3 | our weakness · A_s/r tension |
| D6 honest disclosure | 9 | 7 | 5 | 8 | our strength · atlas + preprint_hold |
| D7 closure characterization | 4→~5* | 1 | 2 | 2 | Layer-A (T) bundles raise honest score · still not Full G |
| Generative composite | 2.67 | 3.8 | 4.07 | QNM 5.87 ranks first | |
* D7 post-W8030 programme-internal calibration · not formal Pass4 rescore.
4.2 Peer strengths vs QNM strengths (side by side)
| Framework | Commonly cited peer strength | QNM relative strength | QNM relative weakness |
|---|---|---|---|
| ΛCDM + inflation | Planck fit · D4/D5 9/10 | generative narrative · obstruction map · D1/D6 | does not beat χ²/fit axis |
| String / 2026 inflation models | n_s, r in-model derive · r consistent with data | Layer-A multi-leg chain breadth · 15/17 panel | single-sector depth · r ~0.0575 disfavor |
| Causal sets | 1987 Λ prior prediction | D6 disclosure · wide staging · 20-node atlas | no comparable iconic prediction |
| AdS/CFT / LQG | narrow hard theorems (duality · area spectrum) | same-chain E0–E3 multiple (T) · emergence-order SSOT | no firewall-free single theorem |
| CDT | 4D emergence MC · partial n_s falsify literature | truthlikeness near (6.5 vs 6.8) · D2 breadth | CDT philosophy rigor high · shallow param surface |
| Wolfram / MUH | generative narrative (high D1) | testable numerics · SSOT · +2.4/+3.3 structural score | — |
4.3 Mission-axis ATT (W27655 · separable from structural score)
| Axis | QNM | Relative position |
|---|---|---|
| A ontology | T3.5–T4 | upper-mid |
| B generative→observational | T2–T2.5 | below AdS/CFT · ΛCDM |
| C mechanism map | T4 band | thick (atlas · Fork C · B/G tables) |
| D auditable test | T4.5 internal | thick (reproducibility 9.2/10 · W27655) |
| G / S / N | G open · S partial · N thick | N-tier obstruction register is differentiator |
5. Hard open gaps (same weight as landed chips)
- E0-S5 parent 22→21 native landing · depth4 / Π* v1–v3 / R2 native exhausted
- G-I3 cross-scale readout composite · dual-leg bridge fraction 0/46 panels (W28423)
- global bridge · Full G · L6 ·
theorem_L6_closure=false - OD-01 A_s ~−7.64% · r tension · F3 not beats-ΛCDM
- mechanism k≥1/7 · programme long-run 0/7 (W8032 Layer B)
6. May say / may not say
May say: all counts and names above · emergence order · 20-node atlas · six Layer-A (T) bundles · two strict breakthrough · 15/17 & 17/17 staging · Pass3 composite 5.87 first · D6=9 · structural truthlikeness rank 6 (6.5/10) · peer strengths acknowledged fairly · authorial epistemic stance box · machine-read reproducibility commitment · Pass3 multi-AI assessment display (author-voluntary · not external review · trust at reader’s discretion).
May not say: beat ΛCDM · Planck closure · Full G · L6 closure · preprint unhold · “only one breakthrough” or “all breakthrough” · matter ontology refuted by observation · prediction already beat causal sets · treat epistemic stance as proved theorem or closure gate · treat consciousness conjecture as derive closure · read “math as truth” as programme fully closed · treat AI composite scores as peer review passed, must be accepted, or a substitute for hard-fact gates.
7. Abbreviations and full names
This section lists programme-specific or easy-to-confuse abbreviations only. Field-common cosmology/publishing terms (e.g. n_s, r, A_s, H₀, w₀, σ₈, τ, ℓ₁, ΛCDM, Λ, BAO, χ², DOI, ORCID) are not glossed again.
7.1 Programme, papers, and authority
| Abbr. | Full name (English) | Short gloss |
|---|---|---|
| QNM | Quantum Narrative Matrix | Main hypothesis programme |
| DFC | Discrete Fragment Cosmology | Pre-QNM programme paper track |
| ACEH | Algebraic Closure Emergence Hypothesis | Π main paper framework |
| SSOT | Single Source of Truth | Canonical machine-readable register |
| π,e,i | Programme generative symbols (L0-A layer) | Not only mathematical constants |
7.2 Emergence order, layers, and theorem tiers
| Abbr. | Full name (English) | Short gloss |
|---|---|---|
| E0-S0…S7 | Emergence-order stages 0–7 (π,e,i→N=22 chain) | See Section 1 table |
| FP | First principles | Non-calibrated knobs |
| (T) | Conditional scoped theorem tier | Layer-A landed bundle |
| Full G | Full generative closure under programme P | Not achieved |
| Layer-A / B / C | Three-tier physical theorem landscape | Scoped / mechanism / strict obstruction |
| L2 | Layer 2 post-geometric admission | sym² @ D=6 |
| L3 | Layer 3 observational sharpen | Not FP closure |
| L6 | Layer-6 / theorem L6 closure gate | theorem_L6_closure=false |
| LB1 | Ladder Bridge 1 candidate chain (2×3→D=6→sym²→N=21) | At N=6 gate |
| JL | Joint ladder | FP_JOINT_LADDER_W5573 |
| T_algo | Algorithmic / iteration mechanism track | From N=3 · i mapping |
| T_topo | Topological / bipartition mechanism track | After N=6 gate · π mapping |
| T_thermo | Thermodynamic / dissipation mechanism track | After N=6 gate · e mapping |
| k | Triangular programme ladder rung index | — |
| N / N_cal / N_dyn | Projected dimension; calibration 21; production 63 | — |
| sym² | Symmetric-square dictionary (D=6 programme candidate) | — |
| so(7) | Special orthogonal Lie algebra so(7) | L2 audit object |
7.3 Programme data window and pipelines (non-common terms)
| Abbr. | Full name (English) | Short gloss |
|---|---|---|
| PARAMS17 | 17-parameter Planck-window panel headline | This programme’s Planck-window 17-parameter headline |
| Pipeline A / B | Programme derivation pipelines A (primary) and B (coarse-grain) | — |
7.4 Pass3 dimensions, ATT mission axes, and peer frameworks
| Abbr. | Full name (English) | Short gloss |
|---|---|---|
| Pass3 | COSMOGENESIS Pass 3 competitor swap-and-beat (W5215) | — |
| D1 | Generativity | — |
| D2 | Parameter derivation | — |
| D3 | Origin uniqueness | — |
| D4 | Falsifiability | — |
| D5 | Empirical fit | — |
| D6 | Internal honesty / disclosure | — |
| D7 | Generative closure (proved) | — |
| ATT | Axis Tier Table (mission axes A–D + G/S/N bands · W27655) | Separable from structural score |
| ATT-A | Generative ontology axis | — |
| ATT-B | Generative-to-observation axis | — |
| ATT-C | Mechanism closure / obstruction map axis | — |
| ATT-D | Epistemic auditability axis | — |
| G / S / N (band) | Global bridge open · Scoped partial · N-tier capstone obstruction thick | — |
| CDT | Causal Dynamical Triangulations | — |
| LQG | Loop Quantum Gravity | — |
| AdS/CFT | Anti-de Sitter / Conformal Field Theory correspondence | — |
| MUH | Mathematical Universe Hypothesis | Wolfram context |
| MC | Monte Carlo / compute assault batch | — |
7.5 Programme tracks, witnesses, and Obstruction Atlas IDs
| Abbr. | Full name (English) | Short gloss |
|---|---|---|
| OD-01 | Open Defect track 01 (M4 A_s gap ~−7.64%) | — |
| M4 | Matter-sector track 4 · amplitude normalization readout | — |
| G-I3 | Global Interface track I3 composite cross-scale witness | — |
| S12 | Sector-12 staging witness spine (s4–s12) | — |
| S15 | Sector-15 calibration anchor & 22→21 handoff register | — |
| EOC | Evolution-Order Capstone (EOC_01–07) | — |
| TI1 / TI2 / TI3 | Thermodynamic Interface ladder stages 1–3 | Matter-readout routes |
| SG1 | Spectral Gap track 1 (Liouvillian slow-mode readout) | — |
| EP1 | Entropy Production track 1 matter readout | — |
| CP1 | Closure Programme 1 production span | — |
| AV-1/3/4 | Axiom Violation / obstruction classes 1, 3, 4 | — |
| M1 | Mechanism track M1 transient bounded run (charter FAIL) | — |
| F2 / F3 / F3b | Forward test tracks 2 (BAO) / 3 (likelihood) / 3b | F3 not authorized beats-ΛCDM |
| B/G | B-layer vs G-layer axiom boundary tables | D5 disclosure |
| Fork C | Programme Fork C honest disclosure / Zenodo addendum | — |
| N-capstone | N-tier capstone verdict under disclosed class | Not global bridge |
| global bridge | Single-map bridge generation → full cosmological panel | Not landed |
| glue | Scoped membership glue counter (0/8 vs W8047 8/8) | Two counters · see body |
| W#### | Programme wave / routing ID (e.g. W8047, W5215) | — |
7.6 Governance, disclosure, and tier status terms
| Abbr. / field | Full name (English) | Short gloss |
|---|---|---|
| breakthrough_en | Programme strict breakthrough landed flag | Currently false |
| preprint_hold | Preprint release hold (governance) | Currently true |
| preprint unhold | Lifting preprint hold | Not authorized to claim |
| beat ΛCDM | Beats ΛCDM on compressed likelihood / χ² | F3 not authorized |
| compat | Compatibility band (not tension resolution) | — |
| 8-seed | Eight independent RNG seeds monitor/prescan | — |
| Capstone | Wave capstone witness artifact (indexed SSOT) | — |
| honest_stop | Prereg-stopped assault after negative prescan | — |
| landed (T) | Landed at conditional scoped theorem tier | — |
| exhausted | Disclosed assault class prereg-exhausted (no rerun) | — |
| Epistemic stance | Authorial positioning on method and limits (not a theorem tier) | See box after Principles; does not flip governance flags |
8. Deep-read SSOT
01_Π_Main_Paper/EMERGENCE_ORDER_PIEI_TO_N22_REGISTER_LATEST.json·01_Π_Main_Paper/EMERGENCE_ORDER_PIEI_TO_N22_SSOT_EN.md- ACEH §3.5 · Figure 7 · §3.3 · QNM §3.12.0 · §3.12.0a · Figure 1 (S16-FLOW)
OBSTRUCTION_ATLAS_CAPSTONE_W27650_LATEST.jsonTHREE_TIER_PHYSICAL_THEOREM_LANDSCAPE_REGISTER_W8032_LATEST.jsonCOSMOGENESIS_PASS3_W5215_LATEST.jsonCOMPETITIVENESS_TIER_ATT_SYNC_W27655_LATEST.jsonW8047_UPSTREAM_BREAKTHROUGH_CHECKPOINT_BOARD_LATEST.json
Disclosure v2.7 · 2026-06-28 · proxy_signoff: approved_proxy_website_programme_progress_disclosure_v2_7_epistemic_placement_en_20260628