Supplementary Material: QNM Cosmic Evolution Film — Methodology and Integrity Disclosure

This note states the methodological boundaries and integrity disclosures for the companion film QNM cosmic evolution: Birth to Death, for reviewers, republication, and reproducibility. The Chinese text is in Supplementary_Material_QNM_cosmic_evolution_Birth_to_Death_ZH.md; this English file is the section-by-section counterpart, with aligned disclosure. This file is English-only; for Chinese abstract or video blurbs, see §6.11 and §7 in the Chinese counterpart.

Chinese counterpart: Supplementary_Material_QNM_cosmic_evolution_Birth_to_Death_ZH.md (full Chinese text; substance matches this file).

Note: A minimal index under Emergent_Sphere/V/UN/ may point here; the full text lives under Emergent_Sphere/V/UB/.

Author: Nanjie Ma ORCID: 0009-0002-4415-1209 Email: phoenix-mx@hotmail.com Date: March 2026 Corresponding paper: The Nature of Reality: The Quantum Narrative Matrix Hypothesis (Ma, 2026)

Associated video (typical output name): QNM_cosmic_evolution_Birth_to_Death.mp4 Primary implementation (this branch): 05_Core_Source_Code/Emergent_Sphere/V/UB/make_grand_unified_universe_UN.py Frame encoding (no physics change): encode_grand_unified_UN.py Standalone integrity audit (Chinese): V/UB/output/UB_可视化来源审计报告_学术诚信.md — §6 matches its technical conclusions (§0 summary includes §2-aligned items on temporal origin); for submission, include §6, that file, or both. Revise them together when the pipeline or disclosure text changes. Extended model vs convention table (English, same folder): V/UB/ACADEMIC_DISCLOSURE.md

Scope: Below we separate numerical simulation on the main view from conventions, tuning, illustrative insets, and mock content in the four-act film (quantum genesis → inflation → cosmic web → holographic heat death), cross-checked against the V/UB source as of March 2026. If other paths in the repository carry older prose, the executable code under V/UB and this note prevail.

1. What this video is (and is not)

Is

• A hybrid pipeline: Act I integrates the N=21 BFSS+Myers matrix model (leapfrog; default Seed 66). Numerical origin of the film chain: the first integration step of this Act I run (model time / step index), which seeds the same run’s geometric potential and  used downstream—not, by itself, a claim of equality with a specific observational cosmic timestamp (e.g. literal ) unless the main text states such a mapping explicitly. Acts II–IV use the same run’s geometric seed (eigenvalue positions → sources for ) and ** sequence derived from the Act I complexity observable  (with disclosed unit/step mapping), fed into effective** large-scale dynamics (Zeldovich-style tracers, Hubble drag, disclosed repulsion term).

• Not an observational fit: the main 3D tracer trajectories are not obtained by fitting to galaxy surveys or  data.

Is not

• A “pure first-principles film” in the narrow sense that every curve and texture on screen is produced only from the microscopic matrix equations without any reference or inset layer. The main 3D chain (matrix evolution, same-run potential , tracers under ) is described under Is above and in the act-by-act tables. Hubble insets add flat ΛCDM reference curves and mock standard candles; CMB patches are Gaussian-noise illustrations; the ** “theory” line is a  power law (with optional per-frame visual jitter)—these support comparison with standard textbook ΛCDM and clarity for the viewer, and are implemented in a separate pipeline layer from the main chain. Stating main-chain numerical output and reference / mock / illustrative elements distinctly** in abstracts or talks reflects the structure faithfully and matches the matrix–macro program in the main paper.

• A substitute for the main paper or the A-system engine (qnm_complete_cosmic_evolution_engine.py) for quantitative cosmology: the film is a communication and exploration product with the boundaries below.

1.1 Models and dependencies (at a glance)

• Matrix microphysics: Emergent_Sphere/bfss_myers_simulator.py — BFSS-type Yang–Mills commutator potential + Myers (Chern–Simons) term, , leapfrog integration; the main script additionally applies per-step momentum damping FRICTION (not part of that module).

•  and : built in the main script from micro_traj → E_eff (mean norm of eigenvalue positions) → C_int (trapezoidal integral) → **; this C is not** bfss_myers_simulator.casimir() — follow the main script implementation.

• Macro: matrix-sourced ** + HolographicLagrangianSampler / evolve_lagrangian_dynamics; optional Bridge 2 () and Bridge 4** ( spectral displacement).

• Reference / insets: flat ΛCDM, Friedmann **, mock/CMB; scipy.ndimage.gaussian_filter optional; cosmic_evolution_video_data.json is UI-only**.

• Full table + index: §6.8.0 (verification table aligned with §6.0 of the integrity attachment in the same folder).

2. Temporal mapping (video time vs physics narrative)

Dynamical origin vs on-screen labels. The pipeline’s numerical starting point is the onset of the Act I matrix integration (the run that defines  and  for Acts II–IV). That is model integration time / step indexing, not—without an explicit construction in the main text—a literal identification with a unique observational clock reading (e.g. ). Phrases such as “Planck-like” on screen are pedagogical narrative anchors on a standard-cosmology timeline for the viewer; they must not be read as  or as one-to-one correspondence with Planck satellite data products.

Playback uses piecewise mapping (different acts compress or stretch intervals) so that narrative stages analogous to Planck-like, inflation-like, structure-formation, and far-future epochs fit in ~110 s at 30 fps. On-screen text indicates the intended epoch; exact  for publication-grade plots should be taken from the engine or main text, not inferred from frame count alone.

Optional cosmic_evolution_video_data.json (A/R) can drive UI labels when present; precomputed macro_traj / heat_death_traj are generated before the matplotlib loop and are not re-fit to that JSON.

3. Act-by-act summary (aligned with make_grand_unified_universe_UN.py)

3.1 Act I — Quantum genesis

• Computed: micro_traj, final eigenvalue coordinates, , , and  on the same trajectory. Origin: step 0 of this integration (model time); any “Planck-era” wording in UI is narrative, not a standalone chronometric claim.

• Conventions / visuals: camera motion, default colours/sizes, phase labels (Chaos / Cooling / …); optional Route B sphere and **** inset when E_int_E_off.npz exists.

3.2 Act II — Inflation (bridge)

• Computed: Cyan seed positions from matrix end-state mapped into the Mpc box; scale factor uses H_act2_peak = H_from_matrix[0] (first Act-I step) with **** convention and _ACT2_TAU so the act ends at  display scale.

• Convention: Orange tracers use the same comoving macro_q as Act III: uniform random fill of the box (not hand-placed galaxies). Only ** and ** are tied to the matrix run.

• Inset caveat: the bottom log–log  strip uses a separate constructed slope to hit display endpoints ( style scaling); it is pedagogical and not the same object as the 3D inflation_factor driving the cyan/orange points.

3.3 Act III — Cosmic web

• Computed: macro_traj from forces ** (sources = matrix-mapped seeds; optional M* weighting of ) plus  from H_from_matrix (indexed with split_idx mapping), Hubble drag, and  repulsion term (coefficient 2.5** unless Bridge 2 overrides with -dependent series).

• Important implementation detail: initialize_fluid_sampling is not called in the current script. Tracers start from uniform box filling, then optional Bridge 4 displacement ( shape from theory; random phases and amplitude normalization are convention). Initial peculiar velocity uses `p = q ) HUBBLE_SIM (disclosed tuning).

• Tuning (not observational fit): G_EFF, EPSILON, DT_MACRO, HUBBLE_SIM, repulsion scale, N_MACRO / N_MACRO_VIS_SCALE, etc.

3.4 Act IV — Holographic heat death

• Computed: heat_death_traj with the tail of H_from_matrix (from ACT4_H_TAIL_FRAC onward), same drag + ** structure as Act III — not a standalone constant H_DE** driving the precomputed trajectory (legacy ACT4_H_DE is deprecated in comments).

• Visual-only: matrix “ghost” positions may include a small sinusoidal factor; fade, palette, and documentary camera lock are cinematic.

4. Inset panels (recommended for disclosure in reports, abstracts, and derivative materials)

InsetRoleIntegrity labelHubble  vs Flat ΛCDM ; mock scatterReference + mock, not dataMoving white point from pipeline;  still ΛCDMMixed:  from sim mapping, distance formula standard yellow “theory”Power law with **; may jitter per frameIllustrative power law, not CAMB/CLASS green “tracers”FFT from current particle positionsPost-process of sim Projection proxy from tracersDiagnostic, not full ray tracingCMB patchSmoothed Gaussian noiseIllustrative onlySFH proxyBlock  vs step if cache existsProxy** from matrix-side cache

5. Methodology boundary table (compact)

5.1 From the model / same run (no observational likelihood fit)

• Act I matrix integration; final seed geometry;  from seeds; , **-type  sequence (scaled to macro steps); precomputed** macro_traj, heat_death_traj therefrom.

5.2 Convention / tuning / RNG / visual

• Uniform tracer ICs; Bridge 4 phases; macro constants; video timing; camera; colours; Act II bottom strip; inset mock/CMB/jitter; optional sin wobble in Act IV.

5.3 Fitting (separate from main film)

• mass_luminosity_preliminary.py: polyfit on simulated  proxies — in public wording, call it regression on simulated proxies; avoid implying that “the whole web sequence was observationally fitted.”

6. Visualization provenance and integrity audit (line-by-line against source)

From §6.1 onward, this section matches the technical conclusions of V/UB/output/UB_可视化来源审计报告_学术诚信.md; entries summarize in-repo source and symbols only, with no undisclosed external datasets. When the implementation or disclosure text is updated, that attachment and this §6 will be maintained together.

6.1 Document nature, scope, and method

Nature: A line-by-line checklist of the visualization pipeline source under 05_Core_Source_Code/Emergent_Sphere/V/UB, suitable for preprint uploads with the paper/code/video or as a Supplementary Note / Data & Code README. Scope: V/UB including output/, 备份/, etc. Audit date: 2026-03-20 (per files in this submission package). Method: Read make_grand_unified_universe_UN.py and sibling helper scripts; cross-check ACADEMIC_DISCLOSURE.md, RESEARCH_VISUALIZATION_SPEC.md; executable UB code prevails over filenames or prose from other branches without implementation.

Not legal advice: This section is technical integrity disclosure only; preprint-platform compliance is governed by author and publisher policy.

6.2 Summary for reviewers and republication (five bullets)

• Main 3D animation: tracer and matrix spatial trajectories come from numerical simulation (matrix segment: BFSS+Myers integration; macro segment: potential  from matrix end-state + Lagrangian evolution under  mapped from the same Act I run + Act IV tail of ). Not statistical fits to survey or power-spectrum data.

• Versus “fitting”: the pipeline does not least-squares / MCMC fit outputs to observations; polyfit in mass_luminosity_preliminary.py is regression on simulated proxies, separate from the main 3D web integration chain.

• Hybridity (should be clear in abstracts and inset captions): the macro segment includes discretization conventions (uniform box fill, random phases for optional  perturbation, effective gravity/step/repulsion coefficients), pure visuals (camera, palette, Act IV matrix sin wobble), and reference/illustrative insets (ΛCDM Hubble curves, mock points, CMB noise sketch). These elements should not be phrased as “one-to-one with Planck-satellite or supernova-survey data products” or “a zero-parameter unique solution.”

• Relation to main-paper figures: module text states macro acts do not follow the main text Figure 14 spectral-topology layout path, but use Zeldovich / N-body-style evolution on matrix seeds; distinguish “paper analytics / spectral construction” from “this film’s EFT discretized simulation”.

• Module string vs implementation (important): the top-of-file English module docstring in make_grand_unified_universe_UN.py is not fully aligned with the same file’s implementation on macro acts and Ċ/C: in code, H_from_matrix is explicitly built from Act I  and a -type discrete formula (with _H_MEAN_TARGET and related scaling). Public technical statements should follow the executable source; the docstring is expected to be revised so “no A/R engine JSON  table driving ” is not read as “no Ċ/C-constructed ”, avoiding conflation.

6.3 Key terms (avoid conflation)

TermMeaning in this sectionComputed / simulationSequences from stepping equations with given ICs and constants, possibly with RNG phases; not parameters inverted to match observations.FittingOptimizing parameters on given points (polyfit, least squares, Bayesian inference); polyfit in §6.9 helpers falls here.Tuning / conventionHuman-chosen constants for stability, visibility, or narrative; disclosed as not observational fitting (aligned with ACADEMIC_DISCLOSURE), not a claim of unique N=21 analytic derivation.Illustrative / mockLooks like data but is noise or rules; in public wording it should not be called real data or full first-principles CMB.

6.4 Main 3D (four acts): what is simulated vs conventional

Scope: large 3D viewport only (matrix cloud + web tracers + heat-death particles), excluding Hubble / CMB /  insets.

ActMostly simulatedMostly convention / tuning / RNG / visualAct I21-point micro_traj (leapfrog_step); with X_traj + Route B,  inset from post-processing.Default colours/sizes, camera elev/azim, speed_act1, cam_dist_micro=final_Rg*3.2; Route B sphere radius/opacity/colour; AGN_TOP_FRAC highlights.Act IIMatrix points: final_micro_coords → sources_mpc (affine into Mpc box) × inflation_factor; ** via H_act2_peak = H_from_matrix[0]; ACT2_SCALE_MIN/MAX for  display range.Orange macros: shared macro_q with Act III — uniform random ICs then scaled with , not continuation of 21 matrix trajectories; camera interpolation, speed_act2, flash rectangle.Act IIImacro_traj: compute_potential_force (sources sources_mpc, optional act3_phi_weights on ) + drag /  with H_from_matrix index map.IC: act3_sampler.q = uniform(box) + optional Bridge 4 ( spectrum, phase RNG**); p = q * HUBBLE_SIM; G_EFF, EPSILON, DT_MACRO, repulsion baseline 2.5 (or Bridge 2 -dependent series + baseline convention); N_MACRO, N_MACRO_VIS_SCALE.Act IVheat_death_traj: same update as Act III, ** from tail** of H_from_matrix (ACT4_H_TAIL_FRAC mapping).Matrix “ghosts”: act2_sources_mpc (1 + sin(...)0.02) (visual); fades, palette, ACT4_VISUAL_TRANSITION_FRAMES, default documentary camera lock, extent×0.72, etc.Implementation note: HolographicLagrangianSampler.initialize_fluid_sampling(...) (optional clustered sampling around seeds) is not called in the current main script; Act III uses uniform box fill plus optional displacement. If a future revision calls this routine, this supplementary note and ACADEMIC_DISCLOSURE.md will be updated accordingly.

6.5 Overview: three-block taxonomy (full frame: main 3D + insets + aux plots)

6.5.1 How to read the blocks

• Block 1: This-run simulation or deterministic post-processing on this-run particle fields (FFT, projection).

• Block 2: Standard cosmology formulas, mock, illustrative textures, hard-coded display curves, pure visuals; in public wording these should be stated separately from the model main chain.

• Block 3: Regression fits on existing simulated points; in public wording should not be called first-principles derivation.

6.5.2 Block 1 — Model / this-run computation

ElementMeaning (overview)Implementation pointersAct I: 21 matrix motionBFSS+Myers integrationmicro_traj, leapfrog_stepActs III/IV: tracer trajectories from mapped seeds + H_from_matrixmacro_traj, heat_death_traj, compute_potential_forceAct II: main 3D matrix scaling from H_from_matrix[0],  range conventionH_act2_peak, inflation_factorInset: green  “tracers”NGP + FFT of current particles_P_k_from_particlesInset: Proxy surface-density contrast from projection_kappa_2d_from_particlesSFH inset (if cache)Precomputed calculate_stellar_propertiesstellar_properties_cache.npzRoute B: When E_int_E_off.npz or analyzer output existsqnm_bh_routeB_analyzer.pyRoute B: horizon sphereDecorative geometry, centroid from clusteringplot_surface, BH centroid

6.5.3 Block 2 — Standard formulas / illustration / hard-coded (distinguish from main chain)

ElementMeaning (overview)Implementation pointersHubble: blue curveFlat ΛCDM , constants from paper/lit_d_L_flat_LCDM, _m_plotHubble: yellow pointsMock scatter_z_sn, _rng_snHubble: white point from film-pipeline mapping,  still ΛCDMz_derived, _distance_modulus yellow “theory”; per-frame scale + RNG jitter_P_plot, progress_pk, _rng_pkCMB insetGaussian noise sketch_cmb_T_map, gaussian_filterAct II bottom log–log  stripEndpoint-matched display curve, not the same narrative object as 3D inflation_factor_ACT2_H_PHYSPalette / flash / 9:16 / DPIProductionFIG_W/H, Rectangle, etc.Macro , , , 2.5Tuning (not observational fit)Top-of-script constants, evolve_lagrangian_dynamicsBridge 4 spectrum; phase/amplitude convention_apply_ns_displacement_to_positionsAct IV: sin wobbleVisualnp.sin(p_frame 0.1) 0.02 displayQuantities may be model-based; nearest-cluster assignment and pixel scale are conventionsapply_holographic_mapping, SIZE_BASE_PX

6.5.4 Block 3 — Fitting

ElementMeaning (overview)Implementation pointersM–L red lineLog–log linear regression on simulated proxiesmass_luminosity_preliminary.py → np.polyfitM–L blue pointsSimulated Same scriptSimulation vs fit: simulation updates state by dynamics; fit optimizes parameters given existing states.

6.6 Subfolders and audit scope

LocationContentsV/UB/output/Run artefacts (frames/, grand_unified_trajectory_data.npz, blender_export_data/, logs, etc.); empty folder does not mean undefined pipeline.V/UB/备份/Backups; same logic as root.Scripts in scope: make_grand_unified_universe_UN.py (main render), encode_grand_unified_UN.py (only encodes frames to video, no physics change), qnm_bh_routeB_analyzer.py, mass_luminosity_preliminary.py, calculate_stellar_properties.py (cache), output/*.md (Blender re-render notes).

6.7 Taxonomy A–E

• A: N=21 matrix dynamics or same-run , , trajectories.

• B: ΛCDM, , etc. standard formulas (constants from paper/lit).

• C: Post-processing on sim particle fields (FFT, projection); transparent algorithm, interpretation depends on tracer definition.

• D: mock, noise illustration, hard-coded display curves, RNG jitter, palette/camera.

• E: polyfit-style regression on simulated data.

6.8 Main-pipeline notes (aligned with ACADEMIC_DISCLOSURE)

6.8.0 Theoretical models and code dependencies (verification table; aligned with standalone audit §6.0 in the same folder)

ComponentIn-repo locationRoleMatrix micro-dynamics05_Core_Source_Code/Emergent_Sphere/bfss_myers_simulator.py: leapfrog_step, rand_hermitian, R_squaredThree Hermitian matrices , default N=21; Hamiltonian = YM-type commutator term + Myers (Chern–Simons) (see file header); leapfrog. Main script multiplies momenta by (1-\texttt{FRICTION}) each step — post-step momentum damping, not a term inside leapfrog_step’s Hamiltonian vector field.Complexity accumulator  and make_grand_unified_universe_UN.py: E_eff, C_int, H_raw, H_from_matrixE_eff: mean eigen-position norm per frame from micro_traj. C_int: trapezoidal integral of E_eff. H_raw , then _scale_H → H_from_matrix. Integrity note: this C is not bfss_myers_simulator.casimir(); cite main-script lines ~864–886.Seed geometry and same filefinal_micro_coords → Mpc sources; compute_potential_force, etc.Macro tracersHolographicLagrangianSampler, evolve_lagrangian_dynamicsLagrangian / N-body-style (Hubble drag,  repulsion, optional Bridge 2).Bridge 4USE_NS_INITIAL_PERTURBATION, etc.Zel’dovich-style; .Standard-cosmos reference_d_L_flat_LCDM, Friedmann integral, _compute_emergent_physics_paramsFlat ΛCDM; optional  series; t0_derived overwrites the “today” anchor.Insets / stack_cmb_T_map; optional scipy.ndimage.gaussian_filterIllustrative CMB noise; graceful fallback without scipy.Optional UIcosmic_evolution_video_data.jsonLabels/timeline only.Core libsnumpy, matplotlibArrays and frames; encode_grand_unified_UN.py for MP4.

•  chain: H_raw ∝ \dot C/C (discrete implementation in script), H_from_matrix = H_raw * _scale_H; _H_MEAN_TARGET is unit/step mapping convention. Display H_scale_km_s_Mpc aligns late-time with paper dynamical  (see script comments).

• Cosmic-age anchor: runtime Friedmann-type integration yields t0_derived, which overwrites ACT3_END_TIME_S and _T0_REF_S (see t0_derived_yr); if a 13.8 Gyr literal appears only in older comments, trust the post-run overwrite.

• Optional A/R JSON: if cosmic_evolution_video_data.json exists, some UI timelines can switch to engine output; does not change how main 3D precomputed trajectories are built (macro_traj / heat_death_traj written before the render loop).

• Bridge 2: if dynamic series enabled, G_eff(z), repulsion(z) from ;  baselines remain conventional (see _compute_emergent_physics_params comments).

6.9 Helper scripts (summary)

• qnm_bh_routeB_analyzer.py: given X_traj.npy, etc., outputs block energy plots and E_int_E_off.npz; plots are computed results plus normal plotting choices.

• mass_luminosity_preliminary.py: scatter = simulated proxies; red line = fit.

• calculate_stellar_properties.py: writes stellar_properties_cache.npz for Act I/III display and  weighting.

6.10 Relation to neighbouring documents

• ACADEMIC_DISCLOSURE.md: same disclosure framework as this note; third-party text that still cites make_grand_unified_universe.py should instead cite make_grand_unified_universe_UN.py (V/UB/) as the film script.

• RESEARCH_VISUALIZATION_SPEC.md: design specification for the film; some effects are gated by environment variables. Corner inset mocks are not sufficient to conclude that “the full sky is uniquely exported from the matrix in one step.”

• make_grand_unified_universe_UN.py module docstring: for ** and Ċ/C, see §6.2 bullet 5; technical judgments follow the executable implementation**.

6.11 Public wording guidance (preprint / video blurb)

Suggested wording for English abstracts, video descriptions, or talk intros:

The film’s main 3D sequence is generated by numerically integrating the N=21 matrix dynamics and evolving macroscopic tracers in a potential sourced by the matrix end-state, with an expansion-rate sequence tied to the same run’s complexity-derived  (with disclosed unit/step mapping and numerical tuning). Inset panels include standard-ΛCDM reference curves, mock scatter, and illustrative CMB texture; these are not observational datasets. No likelihood fit to survey data is performed in this rendering pipeline.

Easy to misread (avoid or narrow the claim)

• Implying that every frame is a zero-parameter, uniquely determined first-principles output.
• Calling CMB / supernova insets Planck- or Union2-grade survey data.
• Claiming the film by itself proves the main theorems of the paper.
• Claiming that “macro never uses -type ” — inconsistent with current V/UB code; if you mean e.g. “not  from the A/R JSON table,” state that separately so it is not confused with the blanket claim above.

6.12 Reproducibility environment and dependencies

ItemNoteMain scriptmake_grand_unified_universe_UN.pyMatrix seedDefault SEED = 66 (changing seed changes micro and macro texture)Dependenciesnumpy, matplotlib; CMB smoothing prefers scipy.ndimage.gaussian_filter, else unsmoothed noisePathsMust import bfss_myers_simulator (Emergent_Sphere root on sys.path)Optional envRESEARCH_DUAL_VIEW, QNM_ACADEMIC_STRICT, QNM_SAVE_MATRIX_TRAJECTORY, etc. (see script)Key outputsoutput/grand_unified_trajectory_data.npz; frames output/frames/; video via encode_grand_unified_UN.py

6.13 Limitations and scholarly role

• N=21 and  tracers are a simplified model + EFT discretization; web filament morphology is sensitive to random phases and reasonable tuning—not a unique, fine-grained falsifiable forecast.

• Corner insets support pedagogy and standard-cosmos comparison; in public wording they should be named separately from main-view model output.

• Role of the film: visualization and reproducible narrative of the mechanism; not a standalone observational evidence chain—substantive claims rest on main-text analysis and systematic numerical/statistical tests.

6.14 Integrity conclusions (short, quotable)

• Main 3D trajectories: numerical simulation; not survey fitting.

• Main chain + conventions: model-driven + disclosed discretization/tuning/visuals; not a “single equation, zero-convention product”.

• Insets: standard formulas + mock + illustration should generally be described separately from the main chain in public statements.

• M–L script: contains fitting; describe separately from the main film.

6.15 Code locator index

TopicFileSymbols / regionAct I: BFSS+Myers integrationbfss_myers_simulator.pyleapfrog_step, rand_hermitian, R_squared buildup and make_grand_unified_universe_UN.pyE_eff, C_int, H_raw, H_from_matrix unit scalingmake_grand_unified_universe_UN.py_H_MEAN_TARGET, _scale_H, H_scale_km_s_MpcAct III uniform IC + Bridge 4sameact3_sampler.q, USE_NS_INITIAL_PERTURBATIONMacro evolutionsameevolve_lagrangian_dynamics, repulsion_coefAct IV tail sameACT4_H_TAIL_FRAC, heat_death_trajCMB / mock SN / ΛCDMsame_cmb_T_map, _m_sn, _d_L_flat_LCDM jittersameprogress_pk, _rng_pkAct II bottom same_ACT2_H_PHYSM–L fitmass_luminosity_preliminary.pynp.polyfit

6.16 Note

This section summarizes only sources and documents distributed with the package. If a reproduction run uses parameters, environment variables, or dependency versions other than the defaults assumed here, behavior is governed by that run. When the implementation changes, this file, ACADEMIC_DISCLOSURE.md, and the integrity attachment in the same folder will be updated <strong>with</strong> the code.

7. Short blurb (video description or poster one-liner)

Aligned with §6.11; wording to avoid — end of §6.11. For the Chinese one-liner, see §7 in the Chinese counterpart.

The main 3D sequence is produced by numerical simulation: matrix dynamics in Act I and Lagrangian tracer evolution in Acts III–IV in the potential and  sequence tied to the same Act I run. Inset panels include standard ΛCDM reference curves, mock supernovae, and an illustrative CMB texture. No likelihood fit to galaxy-survey data is performed in this rendering pipeline.

8. References (this package)

• Ma, N. (2026). The Nature of Reality: The Quantum Narrative Matrix Hypothesis.

• 05_Core_Source_Code/Emergent_Sphere/bfss_myers_simulator.py — Act I BFSS+Myers matrix dynamics (leapfrog).

• V/UB/make_grand_unified_universe_UN.py — primary visualization pipeline.

• V/UB/ACADEMIC_DISCLOSURE.md — full model vs convention table.

• V/UB/output/UB_可视化来源审计报告_学术诚信.md — integrity audit in parallel with §6 (may be submitted as a separate attachment).

• qnm_complete_cosmic_evolution_engine.py — A-system engine (quantitative era evolution; distinct from matplotlib film pipeline).

— End —

-